Monthly Payout Model™
This page documents the model behind Estimated Monthly Payouts™. Shared rules that apply to every PTC estimate — modelled universe, publication gating, baseline governance — are documented in the Estimate Methodology.
What is estimated
The estimated USD-equivalent gross amount a tracked prop firm pays out to its traders in a current, typical month. The unit is money, not transactions and not people.
- Measure
- Gross payout money leaving the firm to traders during a current month, expressed as a USD-equivalent monthly run-rate rather than a specific calendar month's settled accounts.
- Scope
- Firm-level payout volume across the firm's payout arrangements, including simulated-funded payouts where that is the firm's operating model. It is not the volume of any single payment provider or payout rail.
- Not estimated
- Payout transaction counts, payout requests, payout recipients or persons paid, funded-trader counts, cumulative or all-time payouts, challenge fees, refunds, firm revenue, firm profit and net cash flow.
- Relationship to other metrics
- Payouts are a money flow. Populations are counted separately in Estimated Active Traders™ and Estimated Funded Traders™. A payout figure divided by a population is a derived ratio, not an observation.
Model architecture
One hybrid model, two value paths. Every firm in coverage receives a modelled value; firm-specific payout evidence, where it exists and passes the semantic tests, then takes precedence in the role that evidence actually supports.
Public coverage of this model is the tracked Forex prop market and the tracked Futures prop market. Crypto, stocks and multi-asset cohorts are not covered by the published payout model. Firms confirmed closed are excluded from current values and current aggregates.
Payout evidence semantics
Payout disclosures are not interchangeable. Before any figure can be used, the model establishes what it is a quantity of, what period it covers, whose payouts it describes, how complete the payment coverage is, how old it is and how precisely it is stated.
| Evidence | Role | Effect on the estimate |
|---|---|---|
| Current firm-specific monthly or trailing-30-day payout total, precisely stated | Central anchor | Replaces the modelled value and sets the central estimate; range narrows around it. |
| Current firm-specific monthly total stated as a rounded or “over $X” milestone | Evidenced floor | Becomes the lower edge of the estimate, with a wider upper allowance above it. |
| Settled payouts visible on only part of a firm's payout rails | Partial bound | Used as the observed settled amount and is never grossed up to a full-rail figure. |
| Annual, weekly, long-run-average or stale monthly payout figures | Calibration / validation | Supports and corroborates the modelled value; never overrides the current central value. |
| Group-wide or multi-product payout totals for a brand with separate product entities | Calibration or context only | Cannot become a single product's anchor; no split between products is invented. |
| Payout transaction counts, payout-recipient counts, largest or average individual payouts | Context only | Never read as payout money. They describe activity, people or one payment, not volume. |
| Undated payout amounts, unclear units, or contradictory series | Rejected | Excluded entirely. Missing periods and currencies are never inferred. |
Semantic role is never inferred from a field name. It is derived from the stated amount, unit, wording, reporting period, source, scope and date. Where an analyst has classified an observation under this framework, that classification is recorded with the observation and is applied only after the unit tests above have passed.
Evidence-led estimates
“Evidence-led” means the firm's own published payout figures lead the value. It does not mean PTC independently observed or audited the payouts.
- Central value
- A precise, current, firm-scoped monthly or trailing-30-day payout amount becomes the central value, with a range that allows for month-to-month payout timing rather than measurement error.
- Evidenced floor
- A rounded or “over $X” monthly figure is treated as a floor, not an exact total. The central value sits at the evidenced amount and the upper bound allows for the unstated remainder.
- Partial bound
- Where only some payout rails are publicly visible, the visible settled amount is used as observed. It is never scaled up to an assumed full-rail total, so such firms may be understated rather than overstated.
- Freshness limit
- Firm-specific monthly evidence beyond a defined recency window is demoted to calibration and validation. It no longer overrides the current value.
- Attribution
- Firm-published evidence is a company statement, not an independent measurement. On public pages such figures carry PTC Estimate because the published value is still a modelled estimate informed by that statement.
Modelled estimates
Where no admissible current firm-specific payout evidence exists, payouts are modelled from the firm's estimated active trading population and a payout-intensity parameter calibrated separately for each market.
- Construction
- Estimated Active Traders™ for the firm × a payout-per-active-trader parameter for the firm's market. Nothing else enters the central value.
- Separate calibration
- Forex and Futures are calibrated independently, because payout intensity per active trader differs materially between them. There is no single blended industry coefficient.
- Calibration basis
- Each coefficient is derived from a small set of firms whose payout money and active population can both be established, combined so that no single firm dominates. The coefficients are model calibration parameters — they are not observed industry averages, and their values are not published.
- Parameterisation
- Coefficients, band factors, evidence-admissibility windows, confidence weights and publication thresholds are stored as versioned model parameters, snapshotted with each production run rather than hard-coded per run.
- Override
- Admissible current firm-specific payout evidence always takes precedence over the modelled result in the role that evidence supports. Weaker evidence corroborates the modelled value instead of replacing it.
- No fallback coefficient
- A firm outside the two calibrated markets receives no published payout estimate. No global or borrowed coefficient is substituted.
Evidence normalization and guardrails
Most ways of getting a payout model badly wrong are unit, period or scope errors. Each is handled explicitly.
Period, currency and scope are never inferred when the source does not state them. Evidence that cannot be classified is excluded rather than assumed.
Confidence and uncertainty
Confidence describes how well supported a firm's payout value is. Ranges describe how wide the model considers the plausible payout level to be. Neither is a statistical confidence interval.
- Confidence inputs
- The strength of the payout evidence basis, the confidence of the upstream Active Trader estimate, the calibration quality of the firm's market, the age of the evidence that set the value, and scope and rail completeness. These combine into a single score reported as High, Medium or Low.
- Structural caps
- High confidence requires current firm-specific payout evidence. A purely modelled payout value cannot reach High, and modelled Futures values are held below modelled Forex values because the Futures payout calibration rests on a thinner evidence base.
- Evidence-led ranges
- Built around the evidenced amount. Precise current evidence produces the narrowest range; a rounded figure produces an asymmetric range that extends upward from the evidenced floor; partial-rail evidence produces a narrow range around what is actually visible.
- Modelled ranges
- Compound two sources of uncertainty: the range of the upstream active-trader estimate and the dispersion of the payout-intensity calibration for that market. They are consequently wide, and wider for Futures than for Forex.
- Interpretation
- Ranges are model uncertainty bands reflecting evidence quality, calibration dispersion and payout timing volatility. They are not sampling confidence intervals and carry no probability statement.
Publication policy
Every firm in coverage is modelled. Only a small evidence-qualified subset is shown firm by firm, and the two decisions are separate: withholding a firm-level value never changes the estimate or the aggregate.
- Aggregate relationship
- Aggregate payout estimates include every modelled firm in public coverage, including firms withheld from firm-level display. The firm table is therefore not intended to sum to the industry aggregate, and the counts of modelled and displayed firms are published alongside the totals.
- No upward adjustment
- A value below the publication floor is withheld, never lifted to meet it.
- Public basis labels
- Firm rows are labelled Evidence-led estimate where the firm's own payout evidence set or bounded the value, and Modelled estimate where the value came from the active-trader path — including values corroborated by calibration evidence. “Evidence-led” denotes firm-published evidence, not independent verification.
Aggregate and annualized estimates
Market totals are sums of firm-level central estimates. The annualized figure is arithmetic on top of the monthly total and nothing more.
- The Forex total, the Futures total and the combined modelled total are each the sum of the central monthly estimates of the modelled firms in that scope. No separate market-level model is applied.
- Firms confirmed closed are excluded. Cohorts outside public coverage — crypto, stocks, multi-asset — are excluded from both the totals and the firm list.
- Aggregate uncertainty ranges are not published. Summing firm ranges would assume independent errors, which PTC does not claim, so summed bounds are retained as an internal diagnostic only.
- The annualized figure is the current monthly estimate × 12 and is labelled Derived. It is not trailing-twelve-month payouts, not an independently modelled annual estimate, not a forecast, and not industry revenue.
- Any other figure computed from a payout aggregate — a share, a per-trader ratio, a concentration measure — is likewise derived rather than modelled.
- Observed
- Directly measured or recorded data.
- PTC Estimate
- Modelled values based on a disclosed PTC methodology.
- Derived
- Calculated from PTC datasets, rankings or published snapshots.
Coverage and limitations
The material limitations of this model follow from what firms publish about payouts and from the model's dependence on the upstream population estimate.
- Payout timing is lumpy. A firm's actual payouts vary between months, so a monthly run-rate can over- or under-represent any specific month.
- Payout disclosure is voluntary and uneven. Most tracked firms publish no usable current payout figure, so most values are modelled rather than evidence-led.
- Firm-published payout evidence is self-reported. PTC checks it for internal consistency, scope and recency, but does not audit it.
- Payment-rail visibility is incomplete. Where only part of a firm's payouts is publicly settled and visible, that firm's estimate reflects what is visible and may understate the total.
- Modelled values inherit the uncertainty of Estimated Active Traders™, including its own calibration and disclosure limits.
- Payout-intensity calibration rests on a small number of firms in each market. The Futures coefficient is the more fragile of the two: removing individual calibration firms moves it materially, and its plausible range is wide. This is why modelled Futures payouts are range-first at best and are generally withheld at firm level.
- Coverage is the tracked prop market, not the whole industry, and the published payout model covers only the Forex and Futures cohorts.
- A current monthly run-rate is not a historical annual payout figure and should not be compared with firms' lifetime or cumulative payout claims.
Version and update governance
Values change through deliberate, dated model runs rather than a continuous feed. There is no automated monthly refresh of this model.
- Methodology version
- Every estimate carries the model version that produced it. A change to the coefficients, band factors, evidence rules or publication thresholds is a new version, not an edit to existing values.
- Production runs
- Each run is recorded with its date, the firms processed, the outcome and a full snapshot of the parameter values in force, so any published figure can be reproduced against the parameters that produced it.
- History
- Superseded estimates are retained rather than overwritten, so the sequence of values for a firm remains inspectable.
- Baseline
- Published industry figures are read from a locked baseline period rather than from a live recalculation, so headline totals do not move between page loads.
- Cadence
- Refresh is analyst-initiated. PTC does not represent this model as being recalculated automatically on a fixed schedule.